Age at diagnosis and social risks among Black cancer survivors: Results from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort.

BACKGROUND: Social risks are common among cancer survivors who have the fewest financial resources; however, little is known about how prevalence differs by age at diagnosis, despite younger survivors' relatively low incomes and wealth. METHODS: The authors used data from 3703 participants in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort of Black cancer survivors. Participants self-reported several forms of social risks, including food insecurity, housing instability, utility shut-offs, not getting care because of cost or lack of transportation, and feeling unsafe in their home neighborhood. Modified Poisson models were used to estimate prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of social risks by age at diagnosis, controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and cancer-related factors. RESULTS: Overall, 35% of participants reported at least one social risk, and 17% reported two or more risks. Social risk prevalence was highest among young adults aged 20-39 years (47%) followed by those aged 40-54 years (43%), 55-64 years (38%), and 65 years and older (24%; p for trend < .001). Compared with survivors who were aged 65 years and older at diagnosis, adjusted prevalence ratios for any social risk were 1.75 (95% CI, 1.42-2.16) for survivors aged 20-39 years, 1.76 (95% CI, 1.52-2.03) for survivors aged 40-54 years, and 1.41 (95% CI, 1.23-1.60) for survivors aged 55-64 years at diagnosis. Similar associations were observed for individual social risks and experiencing two or more risks. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of Black cancer survivors, social risks were inversely associated with age at diagnosis. Diagnosis in young adulthood and middle age should be considered a risk factor for social risks and should be prioritized in work to reduce the financial effects of cancer on financially vulnerable cancer survivors.

Perspectives of Caregivers Experiencing Persistent Food Insecurity at an Academic Primary Care Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Food insecurity (FI) is often transitory and instigated by changes in family circumstances or environmental events. Clinics have developed interventions to address FI, yet families may face persistent FI. Little is known about persistently food insecure families' experiences with clinic-based interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of caregivers experiencing persistent FI in a clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted 40 semistructured interviews at one academic primary care clinic between July 2019 and December 2019. The clinic routinely screened families for FI at every visit; families screening positive could meet with a care navigator and receive bags of nonperishable foods. Caregivers who received food bags at ≥3 visits, spoke English or Spanish, and were ≥18 years old were eligible to participate. Interviews were recorded, de-identified, transcribed, and systematically coded using inductive content analysis. A modified constant comparative method was used to iteratively review codes, identify emerging themes, and resolve differences through consensus. RESULTS: Forty caregivers were interviewed; all were women; 45% were Hispanic/Latinx and 37.5% African American/Black. Three major themes emerged: 1) unmet social and medical needs and the challenges of caregiving complicate FI; 2) social supports help address FI and other social challenges that present barriers to accessing resources; and 3) caregivers provide practical recommendations for addressing persistent FI. CONCLUSION: Families experiencing persistent FI described important social supports that help address FI and other social challenges that present barriers to accessing resources. Clinic-based resources were welcomed interventions, but their impact may be limited; practical recommendations were made.

Food Insecurity Is an Independent Risk Factor for Depressive Symptoms in Survivors of Digestive Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal and other digestive cancer survivors are at increased risk of depression, which can negatively affect health outcomes. Food insecurity (FI), the lack of consistent access to enough food, can also contribute to these health complications. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between FI and depressive symptoms within this population. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2007-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We included all adults (≥20 years) with a self-reported history of a digestive cancer (including colorectal, esophageal, stomach, liver, and pancreas cancer). Our primary exposure was household FI, and our outcome of interest was depressive symptoms, as measured by the validated 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. We used multivariable ordinal logistic regression to test the association between FI and depressive symptoms, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: We included 229 adult digestive cancer survivors (weighted N = 1,510,579). The majority of the study sample was female and non-Hispanic White with mean of 11.0 years since cancer diagnosis; 14.3% reported FI. In multivariable models controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, we found that food insecure digestive cancer survivors had significantly higher odds of depressive symptoms than food secure digestive cancer survivors (OR: 3.25; 95% confidence interval: 1.24-8.55; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among a nationally representative sample of colorectal cancer and other digestive cancer survivors, FI was associated with increased odds of depressive symptoms. IMPACT: This study adds further evidence to the negative impact FI may have on survivors' physical and mental health.

Association of household food insecurity and childhood weight status in a low-income population.

One in seven US households with children are food insecure. The health effects of household food insecurity (HFI) are well documented, but its association with childhood weight status remains unclear. We aimed to assess this association and to describe correlates of HFI in children. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 3019 low-income children aged 2 to 17 years. Data were extracted via chart review. HFI was assessed using the hunger vital sign screener. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from documented clinical measurements. We used adjusted linear and logistic regression to assess the association of HFI with BMI z-score (BMIz) and weight status. We used logistic regression to examine correlates of HFI including age, race/ethnicity, tobacco exposure, number of parents and siblings living at home, weight status, and census-tract poverty rate and food access. Of participants whose HFI status was documented, 91% were food secure and 9% were food insecure. The mean (SD) BMIz was 0.81 (1.11). Fifty five percentage of children were healthy weight, 18% overweight, and 26% obese. In adjusted analyses, HFI was not associated with BMIz but was associated with decreased odds of obesity (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.36-0.87). Tobacco exposure (1.63; 1.10-2.44), additional siblings (1.16; 1.04-1.30), and residence census tract with high poverty rate (1.02; 1.01-1.03) were all associated with HFI. We concluded that food-insecure children were less likely to have obesity and had differences in household makeup, exposures, and residential location compared to food-secure children. Clinicians should understand these relationships when counselling families about weight status and food insecurity.

Differences in Pediatric Residents' Social Needs Screening Practices Across Health Care Settings.

OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all pediatricians screen for social determinants of health to identify families in need and connect them to available resources. We examined pediatric residents' screening practices for social needs in different clinical settings and explored the influence of electronic health record (EHR) prompts on screening. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, pediatric residents participated in a brief electronic survey assessing (1) screening practices for unmet social needs and (2) perceived barriers to and facilitators of routine screening in the inpatient and outpatient settings. The differences in screening by care setting were assessed by using Fisher's exact test. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to examine the association between EHR prompts and resident screening practices. RESULTS: Ninety-two pediatric residents (64% of the residency program) responded to the survey. Respondents reported significantly higher rates of social needs screening in the outpatient as compared with the inpatient setting (98% vs 37%; P < .001). Residents cited time constraints, lack of knowledge about available resources, and discomfort with screening questions as barriers to screening in both settings. Residents were more likely to screen for social needs when screening questions were embedded in the EHR (odds ratio = 9.6; 95% confidence interval: 6.7-13.9). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric residents were more likely to screen for unmet social needs in the outpatient than in the inpatient setting despite reporting similar barriers to screening in both settings. EHR-based social needs screening templates could be used to increase rates of screening and reach additional families in need.

High Prevalence of Food Insecurity in Participants Attending Weight Management and Bariatric Surgery Programs.

We evaluated the prevalence and correlates of household food insecurity (HFI) in participants attending weight management and bariatric surgery programs (WMP). We surveyed participants (N = 298) residing with a child and romantic partner from two WMP offering bariatric surgery and medical weight management. We assessed HFI using the Hunger Vital Sign and conducted multivariate logistic regression to assess correlates of HFI. HFI was present in 29.2% of participants. There were increased odds of HFI in participants with lower income and those with three or more children living at home. There was no association with sex, race, program type, education, or BMI. HFI is highly prevalent among participants of WMP. WMP should screen all participants for food insecurity to address this potential barrier to a healthy lifestyle.

Written Versus Verbal Food Insecurity Screening in One Primary Care Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Clinics are increasingly interested in identifying food insecurity (FI), but there are limited data on how to implement FI screening. Our objective was to determine the difference in FI disclosure rates by parents/guardians screened by a written questionnaire compared to verbally. METHODS: The study occurred in 1 pediatric primary care clinic in which we screened for FI using the 2-item Hunger Vital Sign. We used interrupted time series to evaluate the effect of changing from the clinician verbal screening to a written questionnaire. Screening results were extracted for all well-child visits from 4/2017 to 10/2018 for children age 0 to 18 years. The outcome was the proportion who screened positive for FI 9 months before and 9 months after the implementation of the written questionnaire. We estimated the difference in the level and trend of positive screens using ordinary least squares regression using Newey-West standard errors and adjusting for autocorrelation. RESULTS: In 7996 well-child visits, 1141 patients (14.3%) screened positive. In bivariate analysis, there was a significant difference in the FI disclosure rates between patients screened by written questionnaire compared to verbally (16.3% vs 10.4%, P < .001). In interrupted time series, changing to the written questionnaire was associated with a significant increase in FI disclosure rates (ß = .04, 95% confidence interval: 0.01, 0.07; P = .02). There was no significant change in the trend in disclosure rates. DISCUSSION: Multiple barriers exist to effectively implementing FI screening in clinical care. Changing from a verbal to a written questionnaire resulted in an immediate and significant increase in the number of parents/guardians who reported FI.

Determining Food-Insecure Families' Resource Access with Health System and Public Data.

Families' access to local food-insecurity (FI) resources differs. This study examines how health system and public data may be combined to identify limitations in community resources designed to address FI. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record (EHR) data from nine practices that screened families for FI. Electronic health record data included demographic and clinical characteristics. Publicly available data included local socioeconomic and food resource information. We calculated the distance from each household to the nearest food pantry and determined the percentage of families who might have difficulty accessing resources. We demonstrate how health systems could merge these data sources to map where food-insecure families live, describe families' access to local resources, and identify regions where gaps in services exist. Health systems could use this approach to support households with FI and advocate for additional services in areas lacking resources in order to target population health efforts.

Successes, Challenges, and Considerations for Integrating Referral into Food Insecurity Screening in Pediatric Settings.

Food insecurity, lack of access to enough food for an active and healthy life, is associated with poor child health. Three pediatric clinics implemented a two-question food insecurity screening of 7,284 families with children younger than five years. Over one thousand (1,133, 15.6%) reported food insecurity and 630 (55.6%) were referred to a benefits access organization for connection to public benefits and community resources. This study evaluated the efficacy of screening and referral through process evaluation, key informant interviews, and focus groups with 19 caregivers and 11 clinic staff. Using grounded theory, transcript themes were coded into facilitators and barriers of screening and referral. Facilitators included trust between caregivers and staff, choice of screening methods, and assistance navigating benefits application. Barriers included complex administration of referral, privacy and stigma concerns, and caregivers' current benefit enrollment or ineligibility. Results demonstrate importance of integrated screening and referral consent processes, strong communication, and convenient outreach for families.